Showing posts with label Mugabe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mugabe. Show all posts

Monday, 1 December 2008

Clock ticking for Mugabe?

He may be losing his grip on the armed forces. Unlike ordinary opposition-supporting Zimbabweans, who have been brutalized by the tyrant for years, these guys have GUNS.

I expressed almost no hope for change when presidential elections were held in the country: it could never be a fair ballot and there was no credible way of making the outcome count in case of an opposition victory. This time round there's nothing to pin our hopes up against, except a more civilized dictatorship.

Yes, I expect a military coup to occur should the army not receive a LOT of government money to silence their woes. It probably won't result in a democracy, but anything's better than Mugabe. At some point the system cracks, and we may be approaching the breaking point.

Friday, 13 June 2008

Mugabe stripped of honorary degree

The University of Massachussets rescinded the 1988 award, on the grounds that

“In the two decades that have passed since the honorary degree was awarded, Robert Mugabe has pursued policies and taken actions that are antithetical to the values and beliefs of the University of Massachusetts,” President Wilson said. “I must recommend that we sever the connection that was formed when Robert Mugabe appeared to be a force for positive change in Africa. Today, that promise no longer exists.”
Earlier this year I remarked that Mugabe will not go peacefully as the outcome of the election got clearer. My fears have sadly materialized, with brutality escalating and the bloodthirsty monster still in the top seat. And we are just as powerless. Where's the United Nations and its eagerness to defend human rights now?

Sunday, 27 April 2008

China recalls death cargo, and how responsible markets could have prevented the stalemate

After days of stalemate China has finally backed down and recalled its weapons shipment to Zimbabwe. The story is fetched from the English edition of Al-Jazeera.

Kudos to the dockers trade unions in South Africa for refusing to unload the crates of oppression that Mugabe so fondly wanted. However regular that shipment may have been on paper, the use to which it would be put was so outrageously clear no-one selling those weapons could expect his hands to be clean of innocent Zimbabwean blood.

Commenting on the shipment at a regular foreign ministry press briefing in Beijing, spokeswoman Jiang Yu said the decision had been taken by the Chinese company involved to recall the vessel.

She said the shipment was completely legal and fell within the established norms of international trade.

"In the field of conventional weapons, we have trade relations with some countries. These are consistent with our laws and with Security Council resolutions and China's international obligations," Jiang said.

"We have been very responsible and cautious with regards to weapons exports."


I can say nothing with respect to the obligations, norms and agreements. What amazes me is that someone would actually decide to take an order from a butcher AFTER an election he was clearly losing. Chinese weapons enterprises seem to combine blindness and the most wicked business spirit in a very efficient manner, making the phrase "business is business" sound eerily disturbing.

I may be accused of double standards. On one hand we have the manufacturer's duty to turn a profit (i.e. sell to whoever buys) and the blindness of the free market. On the other we have the concern for the life of innocent Zimbabweans and the clear indication of a butcher's desire to cling to power at any cost. I wish to analyze this situation in the light of a market failure due to the west's inaction and a lack of market transparency.

Mugabe should have been expected to order more firepower, since his own people were turning against him en masse. A transparent international weapons market would have recorded the assassin's bid for weapons and China's willingness to supply them. All the concerned West should have done then (to put their money where their mouth is) was outbid Zimbabwe for any weapons shipment they laid their eyes on.

The end result could have been the impossibility for Zimbabwe to bid against the economic might of the West (unless some rich thug was willing to buy the weapons for Zimbabwe), a weapons supply shortage causing a rise in prices thereby bankrupting many paramilitary organizations or thuggish governments relying on cheap armaments. A weapons stock exchange maybe, like the system we use for oil supplies?

Although I recognize this is no long-term solution, the market does hold a temporary answer to such crises. In the long-term we should all strive for thugs not to be elected to government in the first place and for democratic means to be the sole way of settling issues of government and representation.

Just a hope for now.